EDUCASIA: Jurnal Pendidikan, Pengajaran, dan Pembelajaran is committed to maintaining the accuracy, transparency, and integrity of the scholarly record. The journal recognizes that scholarly evaluation continues after publication and welcomes constructive academic discussions, critical comments, and evidence-based feedback concerning published articles. This policy is intended to facilitate scholarly dialogue, address concerns regarding published research, and ensure that the academic record remains reliable. EDUCASIA follows the relevant principles and guidance of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) in handling post-publication discussions and corrections.

Scope of Post-Publication Discussion

Post-publication discussion provides an opportunity for readers, researchers, educators, and other members of the academic community to evaluate and discuss articles published in EDUCASIA. Discussions may address research methods, theoretical frameworks, data interpretation, educational practices, research findings, references, and other matters relevant to the article's academic contribution. All discussions must be constructive, evidence-based, respectful, and focused on the scholarly content rather than the personal characteristics of the authors.

Submission of Comments and Academic Responses

Readers and researchers may submit scholarly comments, letters to the editor, or critical responses concerning previously published articles through the journal's official submission system or editorial contact channels. Submissions should clearly identify the article being discussed, explain the issues raised, and provide supporting evidence or relevant references. The editorial team will assess the relevance, originality, academic quality, and ethical appropriateness of each submission before deciding whether it should be considered for publication.